@Article{SennaCostShim:2005:CoFiMe,
author = "Senna, M{\^o}nica C. A. and Costa, Marcos H. and Shimabukuro,
Yosio Edemir",
affiliation = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Divis{\~a}o de
Sensoriamento Remoto (INPE, DSR), Department of Agricultural and
Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Vi{\c{c}}osa
(UFV), Vi{\c{c}}osa, Minas Gerais, Brazil",
title = "Fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by Amazon
tropical forest: A comparison of field measurements, modeling, and
remote sensing",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
year = "2005",
volume = "110",
number = "G01008",
keywords = "tropical forest, Amazonia, FAPAR, IBIS, MODIS.",
abstract = "The fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation
(FAPAR) is a vegetation biophysical variable that characterizes
energy, mass, and momentum exchanges and is used extensively in
models that represent the transfer of energy, carbon, water, and
the biogeochemistry of terrestrial ecosystems. This paper compares
three estimates of FAPAR by an Amazonian tropical rain forest. In
the Tapaj{\'o}s National Forest, near Santar{\'e}m, state of
Par{\'a}, Brazil, FAPAR is estimated based on field measurements,
modeling (using IBIS which simulates the fluxes in the
soil-vegetation-atmosphere system considering two vegetation
layers) and remotely sensed Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer (MODIS) monthly FAPAR product, which has not
been validated for a tropical rain forest yet. FAPAR based on
field observations is calculated from incoming and reflected PAR
measurements taken above the canopy, and downward PAR at a 15 m
height, corrected to be representative of the entire canopy,
obtaining an annual mean value of 0.91. FAPAR simulated by the
Integrated Biosphere Simulator (IBIS) is 0.76, while the annual
average FAPAR estimated by MODIS is 0.85. If we consider that
MODIS estimates include only PAR absorbed by leaves, the remote
sensing estimates are very close to field measurements corrected
to include only the absorption by leaves (0.87); hence we conclude
that the MODIS FAPAR product for the tropical rain forest is
reliable to be used in future studies. However, model estimates of
FAPAR for the tropical forest are low, and adjustments on the
algorithm used to calculate the absorbed radiation by the canopy
are necessary.",
doi = "10.1029/2004JG000005",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JG000005",
issn = "0148-0227 and 2156-2202",
language = "en",
targetfile = "2004JG000005-1.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "01 maio 2024"
}